| CATEGORY |
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Needs
Improvement |
| Buttons -
Navigation |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled and all similar buttons (e.g., Back, Home,
Next,etc.) appear in the same place on different cards. |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled. Most similar buttons (e.g., Back, Home, Next, etc.)
appear in the same place on different cards. |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled. Placement of buttons apears random from card to
card. |
Buttons are not adequately
labeled and placement of buttons appears random from card to
card. |
| Buttons and Links Work
Correctly |
All buttons and links work
correctly. |
Most (99-90%) buttons and
links work correctly |
Many (89-75%) of the
buttons and links work correctly. |
Fewer than 75% of the
buttons work correctly. |
| Background |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the
topic. |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card. |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. |
Background makes it
difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the
page. |
| Originality |
Presentation shows
considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and
ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. |
Presentation shows some
originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are
presented in an interesting way. |
Presentation shows an
attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. |
Presentation is a rehash
of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very
little attempt at original thought. |
| Text - Font Choice
& Formatting |
Font formats (e.g., color,
bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance
readability and content. |
Font formats have been
carefully planned to enhance readability. |
Font formating has been
carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a
little hard to read. |
Font formatting makes it
very difficult to read the material. |
| Content - Accuracy |
All content throughout the
presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. |
Most of the content is
accurate but there is one piece of information that might be
inaccurate. |
The content is generally
accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or
inaccurate. |
Content is typically
confusing or contains more than one factual error. |
| Use of Graphics |
All graphics are
attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content
of the presentation. |
A few graphics are not
attractive but all support the theme/content of the
presentation. |
All graphics are
attractive but a few do not seem to support the
theme/content of the presentation. |
Several graphics are
unattractive AND detract from the content of the
presentation. |
| Effectiveness |
Project includes all
material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
topic. It is a highly effective study guide. |
Project includes most
material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an
adequate study guide. |
Project is missing more
than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study
guide. |
Project is lacking several
key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study
guide. |
