| CATEGORY |
Excellent |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Needs
Improvement |
| Background |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the
topic. |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card. |
Background does not
detract from text or other graphics. |
Background makes it
difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the
page. |
| Use of
Graphics |
All graphics are
attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content
of the presentation. |
A few graphics are not
attractive but all support the theme/content of the
presentation |
All graphics are
attractive but a few do not seem to support the
theme/content of the presentation |
Several graphics are
unattractive AND detract from the content of the
presentation |
| Text - Font Choice
& Formatting |
Font formats (e.g., color,
bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance
readability and content. |
Font formats have been
carefully planned to enhance readability. |
Font formating has been
carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a
little hard to read. |
Font formatting makes it
very difficult to read the material. |
| Buttons -
Navigation |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled and all similar buttons (e.g., Back, Home,
Next,etc.) appear in the same place on different
cards. |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled. Most similar buttons (e.g., Back, Home, Next, etc.)
appear in the same place on different cards. |
Buttons are appropriately
labeled. Placement of buttons apears random from card to
card. |
Buttons are not adequately
labeled and placement of buttons appears random from card to
card. |
| Sequencing of
Information |
Information is organized
in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type
of material that might be on the next card. |
Most information is
organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of
information seems out of place. |
Some information is
logically sequenced. An occassional card or item of
information seems out of place. |
There is no clear plan for
the organization of information. |
| Spelling and Grammar |
Presentation has no
misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has 1-2
misspellings, but no grammatical errors. |
Presentation has 1-2
grammatical errors but no misspellings. |
Presentation has more than
2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
| Effectiveness |
Project includes all
material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
topic. It is a highly effective study guide. |
Project includes most
material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an
adequate study guide. |
Project is missing more
than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study
guide. |
Project is lacking several
key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study
guide. |
